Quote:
Originally posted by KevanGuy+Nov 19 2004, 02:32 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (KevanGuy @ Nov 19 2004, 02:32 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Pointman@Nov 19 2004, 02:28 PM
1) Hawks are terrble
2) Panthers now have as many points as Hawks
3) That means that Panthers are excellent
|
1) Check!
2) Check!
3) Check! [/b][/quote]
True!
If the only argument that Panthers are great is that they have as many points as Hawks, what that makes Bruins? Oh they are 6 points higher than Hawks they are probably as great as 91-92 Penguins!
I also didn't get that "1st pick" thing.
It was a great plan by Panthers GM to pay a lot for his 1st and then climb up the standings to make this pick as bad as possible. Average GM would rather go on the run first and then trade for his 1st for much cheaper, but Panthers GM showed great GM skills to go an unorthodox way.
On the other hand, moronic Hawks GM sold Panthers 1st when they were very low and hold onto Stars 1st rounder, who is very likely to be top 3 at worst. Yeah, check out Stars, man.
