Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau
I think the keep stone. Worst case he can play 7th D and rotate in. Plus you know there will be an injury at some point
|
My thinking too. Stone, though overpaid, is a good guy to keep this year. He has experience and can step up in a pinch. If he get's passed over by Andersson, he's likely got enough trade value to get something in return. Though arguably there isn't there isn't much difference talent-wise between Stone and Kulak, I feel more comfortable with Andersson playing with someone like Stone, than Kulak (who is still figuring things out himself).