Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
This is my thought too ...
My assumption across the league would be 6 GMs get a 1, 6 get a 2, 6 get a 3 etc
In that world I can't put Treliving at 1 and because of that I moved him from a 2 to a 3.
|
I’ve noticed you using this criteria across the other threads. I don’t think it’s correct the way you’ve framed the question. It’s a question of confidence in the GM rather than a ranking of GMs.
More than an average number of GMs screw up the trade deadline and free agency so fans shouldn’t be confident in the average GMs ability in these two areas. So I thinking grading on a curve would be more correct here. A big spike around 2 and then a bell curve around it