Quote:
Originally Posted by the2bears
He didn't make anything "public", this is just a rather vague comment directed at no one in particular.
As for a "precedent"? For what? This doesn't suddenly change negotiating tactics next year. Agents know that, they'd be laughed out of the room if they brought this up.
I think you're worrying for nothing.
|
I got to admit you are right in a way. Not such a big deal. But if GM is using the bad year as leverage for keeping salaries low, agents have all rights to do the opposite after good season. Pretty sure NHLPA would agree with me. I would say its fair.