Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson
My gut and the statistics tell me Puljujarvi is currently the better player and I also think he has higher upside. Therefore, I think I’d do this trade for sure. However, despite the fact that Puljujarvi has better stats despite playing more difficult opposition and starting in the defensive zone more often, the one thing you can’t discount is Puljujarvi had better linemates. So this probably skews the stats in Puljujarvi’s favour a bit.
Playing circumstances
Puljujarvi
OZS% 50.10%,
Quality of Opposition 0.1395,
Linemates
22.18% Lucic - McDavid - Puljujarvi
10.35% Lucic - Puljujarvi - Strome
10.08% Lucic - RNH - Puljujarvi
Bennett
OZS% 59.23
Quality of Opposition -0.0376
Linemates
25.24% Bennett - Jankowski - Hathaway
GAR
Puljujarvi - 46
Bennett - 19
Goals for percentage
Puljujarvi - 48.39% (on ice save % - 93.12, on ice shooting percentage - 6.64)
Bennett - 40.9% (on ice save % - 91.73, on ice shooting percentage - 5.66)
CF%
Puljujarvi - 50.96%
Bennett - 52.6%
Relative CF%
Puljujarvi - +1.8%
Bennett - -1.3%
I also think Puljujarvi would fit in rather nicely simply because a Frolik is able to play either wing.
Gaudreau - Monahan - Lindholm
Tkachuk - Backlund - Neal
Frolik - Ryan - Puljujarvi
Mangiapane - Jankowski - Czarnik
|
You cited metrics not stats.