Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
that's actually impressive, not even off by 100k in both cases.
Predicting a one year deal for Neal was still incredibly stupid though.
|
Yea, there's something definitely off about his calculations.
It seems he's treating every player (young or not) as a very young player heading into their 2nd contract and deciding that their contracts should get more expensive the more years it is (which makes sense for young RFA players), rather than less expensive for the older players.