Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Actually I can blame the players without blaming the guy that brought them in, if they don't perform like they did before. Peters I grant you has not been a winning coach. But let's say he hired Sutter but things didn't work out - would that therefore have been a bad decision, based on the facts before him?
Treliving works with what's available to him. So explain to me what better moves he could have made now, even if the results don't come in. Or explain what better moves he could have made before? The only one that's purely on him is GG's hiring. Brouwer was a huge miss, but also a guy that never put up less than 33 points and 17 goals after his rookie year. If anything, Brouwer was noted as a consistent player. Then things fell apart.
|
So as long as the GM's moves look good on paper they are not responsible for on ice results - that is what you are saying here?