Quote:
Originally Posted by RichKlit
Seems I’m in the minority and I’ve said it a couple times already but the term and the suggested cost is outrageous for a 31 year old. He has steep decline written all over him. IMO we need to avoid Neal at anything close to the suggested numbers.
|
the minority isn't vocal is all...
I like Neal, but term and length will both be too much... if you could get him to sign 3 years like PS did, then sure... otherwise i'd steer clear