View Single Post
Old 12-08-2006, 03:10 PM   #36
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cube Inmate View Post
Quick question then: If two people's so-called rights are in conflict, how should we determine which one gets his/her way? Something has to give, doesn't it? Some rights have to trump others. Who should get to decide?

That's the problem with this Charter...people have taken their enshrined "rights" as an absolute entitlement, and forgotten that compromise is required.
Please give me an example of where two seperate person's rights are in direct conflict where one of them has to be denied their civil right for the sake of the other person's civil right.
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote