Quote:
Originally Posted by MJK
How do you explain Rask coming off a big year 34-14-5 .917 Sv% to basically be rated one of the worst starters in the league at #25. This is the definition of a farce.
|
Most of his individual attributes are strong. Looks like he's taken down by a lower ST rating. I didn't do these ratings so I'm not going to explain each and every one.
I'm happy to answer questions but don't appreciate the use of the word "farce".
It is easy to cherry pick and find specific ratings that aren't perfect.