Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
I see far more value in doing Dougie for:
23 y/o - Lindholm (45pts avg) on a struggling Carolina team
21 y/o - Hanifin (30 pts avg) on a struggling Carolina team - 4th man minutes
Then trading 1 for 1 for:
26 y/o - Stone (60pts avg) 20g/40a playing primarily top line minutes.
This because I think Lindholm can = 60pts w/ Calgary and wont command the same salary Stone gets and is 3 years younger giving us a bigger window.
|
Sort of a weird comparison you are making. Lindhom was also play top line minutes on a better team. You would think he gets more points then Stone who played with worse line mates .
The Salary and being younger is what you should be focusing on more so then production. I'll be curious to see what happens with Lindholm as he mentioned he prefers to play center. Maybe that changes in Calgary though.