View Single Post
Old 06-23-2018, 05:08 PM   #97
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh Jahrmes View Post
Wait, what? Hamilton was a 1st+2nd+2nd.. are you saying Ferland = 2x1st?

Clearly, I'm being obtuse here, but I don't think I'm the only one.
Here's how I break it down in terms of apples to apples:

Hamilton = 1st + 1st + 2nd
Ferland = 2nd + late round pick
Fox = 2nd + late round pick

Reasons: Hamilton only improved his value and so his younger value (1st + two 2nds) is upgraded so that one of those 2nds are now a first. He is now a legit franchise D-man, the kind who are rarely traded. Ferland is now a twenty goal scorer just hitting his prime and is a highly physical player who can go up and down the line-up. Fox was drafted as a 3rd and since then his stock has risen exponentially, given his NCAA performance is historically exceptional for a young D-man.

Hanifin = 1st + 2nd + 2nd
Lindholm = 1st + 3rd

Reasons: Hanifin is worth at least what Dougie was worth when he was traded from Boston. A possible franchise D-man value. Lindholm, however, has been in the league five years now and recently regressed from his career-high 45pts in 72 gp. Not quite Tomas Tatar value but more than Ryan Hartman value.

Tally:
Flames acquire: (X2) 1st rounders, (X2) 2nd rounders, 3rd + late round pick
Canes acquire: (X2) 1st rounders, (X3) 2nd rounders, + (X2) late round pick

Not surprising. Treliving is banking on two things:

1) Sold high on Ferland, Fox, and Hamilton, assuming they reached their ceiling.
2) Bought low on Lindholm and Hanifin assuming they haven't reached their ceiling.
MarkGio is offline   Reply With Quote