Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Ferland is a great fit on that first line because he is a multi-dimensional player who brings an ability to score along with a physical edge that keeps the opposition honest. This is the dynamic on that line which allows Gaudreau and Monahan more room to do what they do. Lindholm, while a good player in his own right, does not provide those qualities. Lindholm is more like Bennett and would not provide that space making quality for Gaudreau and Monahan. Bennett was not a good fit on that line, so there is no guarantee that Lindholm would do much better. It is an unknown, but trends suggest the line does best with someone who can make room for that duo to generate scoring chances.
|
Very well put. Ferland is going nowhere. People also forget his McGratton like character, putting his life back together. He brings even more than his great chemistry and stat trend line.
He is one of those 'good in the room' guys that can actually play.
Some folks are throwing him into deals like cart filler when he could be the most complete player in the trade.