View Single Post
Old 06-21-2018, 10:19 AM   #208
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames_F.T.W View Post
While I think Lindholm and Hannifin would be solid (if not spectacular) value, the more I think about it, the less I'm satisfied. We don't need to move Hamilton. I think if he gets moved, it should be for nothing less than a young star player... not players who haven't reached their potential (ie: Lindholm and Hannifin). Players along the lines of Stone, Marner, Panarin etc.. If Lindholm and Hannifin fail to improve, the trade is essentially quality (Hamilton) for quantity (depth pieces). Too much risk for letting go of a 25 year old top pairing RHD-- which is among the hardest commodities to come by

I agree with this, I think at this point we need to look at star players not reclamation, not diamonds in the rough, nor just potential. I think there comes a point where we need to focus on established proven players. This especially considering all the projects we tried last couple of seasons including the coaching staff, didn't work out.

If we trade Hamilton, it should be for a home run nothing less.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DazzlinDino For This Useful Post: