Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
That's fine. I just see it differently. I will ask though on points 2 and 3. No matter if he signs or not, why wouldn't a player be all in at an NHL development camp? His hockey career is still on the line whether he signs here or not. So that argument still doesn't make a lot of sense.
I just don't understand how 50/50 is a bad thing at this point. And trying to bump up the chance he signs in Calgary based on essentially nothing is even stranger. All I'm saying is it is still a coin flip. Anything more than that is just hopeful enthusiasm, which isn't a bad thing.
I flat out do not know which way Fox goes. Nor do any other of us fans.
What I do know is people want fox, he has trade value and Can be used a nice chip to get what you want.
You brought up your ranked list order of D prospects yesterday and had Fox at the top of Do not trade.
I get it. But I disagree, Kylington and Andersson and Valimaki are equally on top of the do not trade list with fox on the outside.
|
Saying it’s 50/50 is just as arbitrary though. The fact there are two outcomes doesn’t make it a coin flip. It comes down to the probability of either scenario for which we don’t know anything