Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan
Seems like you're disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing, or unwilling to move off your stance (if I read correctly, is that Fox isn't going to get you a late first).
It's entirely reasonable to think the Flames could get a first for Fox. I would ask for more.
Can't recall which writer specifically, maybe it was Pronman, had Fox as the Flames top prospect in the Athletic.
|
I'm disagreeing because I disagree.
Fox as a prospect is absolutely worth a first. That part I am not debating, I hope that was clear.
But because of the uncertainly surrounding Fox signing a contract, I do not think a team would we willing to give up a first for him, unless of course he signed as part of that trade.