Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
I've seen him several times explain clearly that he would be happy to address a person as they request. This is what is so infuriating about the far left, they simply don't care and will continue to say things like this:
This is a lie, period. Peterson never said he would refuse to address a person how they prefer he said the opposite.
|
It's no more of a lie than Peterson stating that Bill C-16 would compel him to address trans people by their preferred pronouns. But fine, if it was an unfair mischaracterization, I'll walk it back. One of Seth's reasons for believing that Peterson is hostile towards trans people is right in that tweet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
9/ Peterson is hostile to transgender persons—even regularly mis-citing data on such persons and on being transgender—because he holds an essentialist view of gender that originates in myth. So his postmodernism hides a retrograde philosophy. But where's his post-postmodernism?
|
He actually expands on this in another tweet.
https://twitter.com/user/status/998029909825085440