Quote:
Originally Posted by tkflames
Revisionist history: Who would the Pens have lost if not MAF?
It is only poor asset mgmt if you believe that:
Losing MAF + losing next best available player - any assets obtained for MAF is better than just losing MAF.
This equation simplifies to:
Are assets received for MAF better than the next best available player with the disclaimer that I cannot recall if MAF had a no movement clause.
|
I think trading a top 5 goalie and losing a bottom 6 player would have been a net gain for the Pens...They could have easily protected all their top end talent.
Again, tough to criticize the cup winning team but I think the missed the boat a bit having two high end goalies.
Look at their roster, they wouldn't have lost much