Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamer
Ok, here's where I have a completely open mind.
Someone please convince me that Vegas goal shouldn't count. I will not be an ass, and I'm listening. A lot of experts and analysts seem ok with the decision, but I just can't understand why.
I know I'm missing something. Help me out!
|
The closest I can find is in the rules, table 16 situation 1C.
Quote:
1. THE GOALKEEPER IS IN THE GOAL CREASE.
C. An attacking player makes incidental contact with the goalkeeper at the same time a goal is scored.
Goal is disallowed. The official in his judgment may call a minor penalty on the attacking player. The announcement should be, “No goal due to interference with the goalkeeper.”
|
Only thing questionable is at the same time, can be interpreted as the whole sequence there. In that case, no goal is a good call.
No wonder even players don’t get goaltender interference calls.