Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Doesn’t matter as they would have either had to leave a dman unprotected (Brodie, Hamilton or Gio) or expose lazar and two other forwards
They could either do 7f 3d or 8 total
So that means
Gio
Hamilton
Brodie
DE
Johnny
Sam
Backlund
Monahan
So that’s 8 leaving Lazar, Ferland, Frolik all exposed. All to protect a pending ufa who seemed on his way to Vegas. That’s nuts.
|
Totally valid point on the expansion draft. I was wrong to think that the Flames should have protected Engelland.... well obviously they couldn't as he was a UFA.
With 20/20 hind sight UFA Backlund / Frolik / Ferland/ Sam and Lazar and Brodie looked a lot better at expansion draft time than they do today.
The point I am trying to make with Engelland was that Hamonic was brought in as a replacement and based on the 2016-17 season Hamonic was not an upgrade. Somehow the Flames management (and fan base) missed this
A common reason for acquiring Hamonic was keeping him away from Edmonton. That is never a good reason....
also he was a "value" contract at 3.85m for another 3 years.
Engelland who was vastly overpaid to provide very similar defense capabilities as well a far more significant physical presence and the "A" in Vegas might indicate leadership was paid 2.9M for his 3 years in Calgary.
All the BS about a mid level first round draft choice not having equivalent value compared to Hamonic how many votes do we have for Hamonic being more important to the Flames than last years #16 pick.