Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Is break even better than losing a couple hundred million?
If the argument is that the city needs a venue, which I and apparently the city agree that it does, does it make more sense to build a venue that breaks even or one that loses 15 million a year?
|
What makes you think that option even exists? Break-even is what happens in large markets. Losing a couple of hundred million is what happens in small markets. The City of Calgary can't just decide to have a population of 3 million.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
|