Not puzzling at all, in context.
Haynes he doesn't know if great coaches make great teams, or vice versa. So because the great Babcock has either missed playoffs or not madr it out of first round in 5 years, does that mean he's not a great coach? Or is he a great coach who lately hasn't had great teams? Was the gold a product of a great team or great coaching, or both?
This is how I read it anyway, and I agree.
|