Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Excellent point and I agree 100%.
But the fact remains that we have to get more from the D. Especially since the D is (theoretically at least) the strength of the lineup.
|
Exactly, especially because (as your OP shows), the D seems to have the capability to give more.
I agree with the general sentiment about allowing the mobile D-men (like Hamilton, Brodie, Gio and even Kulak) to engage more in the offensive zone.
Watching Winnipeg in the playoffs, I’ve noticed how often their D will jump into the cycle, with their forwards consciously replacing them positionally so as to ensure team-defensive responsibility. It seemed that under Gulutzan, the D were asked more to stay at the points and get the puck on net as a means of creating second chances in tight. This isn’t a terrible strategy per se, but given how little room there is on the ice nowadays, it’s really hard to get point shots through. Teams have to find creative ways to create space. Activating the D in this manner seems to be one way successful teams are doing it. (Plus, if all 5 players can move around constantly, they have a pretty good chance of wearing out opposing defenders.)
I think with the Flames’ D and overall speed up front, they should be able to do this more regularly, instead of funnelling wrist shots to the net from the points.
PS: great thread about a really key aspect to the Flames’ success going forward! (Pardon that pun.)