Quote:
Originally Posted by AltaGuy
Exactly! We have a new coach with a decidedly worse track-record and statistics behind him than others available. So the rational opinion right now is something along the lines of: “ah crap, wth Treliving?”
I would suggest any “rationale” for why Peters is a better hire than others is just a “wing and a prayer” scenario. Which isn’t out of line in sports fans by any stretch, but if you’re interested in the facts backing opinions, I don’t see how any facts support Peters being a better hire than many other possibilities.
|
As others have said if all we are going to look at is records then they should have just hired the available coach with the highest career winning percent.
None of us understand the coach enough to make a judgement either way.
I don't see what's wrong with admitting that.