Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
This is not my intention at all. I am only suggesting that we don't really have a good idea as to who the GM and his advisors consider to be the top candidates for the Flames head coaching job. In this vacuum of information it seems pretty presumptuous to think that Treliving's shortlist should look anything like ours.
|
His last "out of the box" hire (likely his first and only one) blew up spectacularly in his face. So I'm willing to bet that his shortlist looks very similar to CP's since there are only a handful of "experienced" names out there and some of them already being mentioned as potential replacements for Gulutzan, their coaching styles and impressions already getting dissected.
Why do you consider that a 'presumptuous' thing to assume? Is it presumptuous, hasty, or arrogant to form judgements based solely on not being 100% privy on their coaching review process?