Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
So look at them and get back to us. You keep saying in effect we need to look closer, look deeper, find out more. And? Nothing ever comes of it, nothing further is ever revealed.
Consider that maybe just maybe an in depth analysis is not going to explain why Gulutzan was actually a good coach, and in fact was not a good coach and his record accurately reflects this. This can also be applied to other NHL coaches. Which is why people are fed up with "the smartest guy in the room" coaching picks and want a guy with a winning record.
|
First off all I don't have to watch 50 hockey games hitting pause every 15 seconds to suggest the work should be done. They pay a team of three guys to do that, and they should.
So don't look for a reveal from me, it's not coming.
Don't look for a reveal from the team either as they'd want to keep their analysis private.
But that doesn't men it shouldn't be done.
Secondly, I've always considered that the analysis won't reveal an answer but it wouldn't be a stone I wouldn't turnover before making a pretty important firing and hiring decision.