Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo
So now we are hoping Peters if hired can be the next Gallant or Sullivan or whatever? Why don't we just hire the guy who already has that résumé? (If he wants to come here)
|
Like Claude Julien? Ron Wilson? Randy Caryle? All of those guys had that on their resume too and results are mixed on all 3. I'm biased as I work in investment, but I think coaching is pretty similar. Past performance is not always indicative of future performance.
Irregardless of whether it is Sutter, AV, Peters Keefe or heck even Ryan Huska it's pretty much a given that if the next coach doesn't work out this team is back to the drawing board anyway. Because I don't agree with the idea that past performance guarantees future success, i'd much rather see Treliving pick the guy who he thinks is the best fit for the group.