Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
Any coach might or might not work. A proven coach might suck here, but the tangibles you're hiring a proven coach for are a lot easier to justify.
If Peters is hired here, and we do well, then thank god, but if he doesn't? How does Brad justify another experiment for a coaching hire again?
|
He doesn't. If the next coach fails in the short term then Treliving will probably lose his job.
Quote:
|
...I just don't see it as a time to gamble on a hire. He needs to get this one right. Peters is a gamble, and not just in the sense that any coaching hire is a gamble, because yes, they are. He's more of a gamble because he just hasn't shown he can do it here in the same amount of seasons Gulatzan has had.
|
So, why has Peters not experienced much success in his NHL coaching career? Do you know?