So, was Friedman just speculating on Peters, or did he claim to know something on the inside?
Friedman is a good insider on a lot of things, but he also speculates on his own a lot (and usually makes it clear when he is just speculating).
If it ends up being Peters, I will wait to see the results before judging, just like I did with Gulutzan (though my gut feeling at the time was that it was a bad hire).
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|