To me, much of the evidence points to Treliving being a pretty patient GM. My own opinion of course. "The process" and other tired terms have been kicked around ad nauseum.
If I were to guess, much of the itchy trigger finger stuff, comes from pressure from the owners. This franchise among others has a track record of over involved owners, when things aren't going so well.
The history of the league can support both sides of the argument of keeping or firing the coach. I think the history of the league presents a pretty overwhelming argument that continually recycling upper management is the recipe for forever being aweful. Unless upper management is a tire fire.
Removing Treliving would be an aweful move.
Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk
|