Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper
Yes and we've done that for 29 years. 14 different coaches. We've had 29 years to field a better roster that could actually be more than just a middling team, but fact is, we haven't. Until we stop thinking the same way and trying to beat that square peg into a round hole, we're not going anywhere.
We tried to vastly different systems between 2 vastly different coaches and we're still getting the same results. I've already reached my conclusion on what I think needs to be changed and to me, it's not a coaching problem no matter how many people tell me otherwise. I've seen the same song and dance too many times for the last 20+ years.
|
I'm not exactly sure why you are going through so much trouble to defend Gulutzan. You watched the games did you not? You have seen the standings have you not? It's kind of a no-brainer at this point that the coaching staff has been part of the problem. I don't know how anyone at this stage could dispute that.
When you consider the following coaches over the past 20 years include; Page (poor), Brian Sutter (mediocre) Hay (horrible), Gilbert (even worse than Hay), Playfair (not effective, wasn't respected), Keenan (past his prime but laughably the best of the lot), Hartley (outdated methods), and Gulutzan (near identical mediocrity in 4 years with two teams) that just maybe a big part of the "
song and dance" is that this organization has a habit of hiring bad coaches?