Quote:
Originally Posted by FiveSeven
In my opinion, I KNOW he isn't good enough. What part of the evaluation process am I missing? A few angry or motivating speeches behind closed doors? I'm sure he's a good person all around, but this is results oriented. If this was his first year I would be way more open to a whole bundle of excuses.
Obviously we aren't privy to all knowledge but based on what I do know, If he keeps his job, I'll be absolutely shocked. If he does keep it, I would hope the leash would be very short.
When a coach doesn't get results and has...
1. A system that stifles creativity, and speed for possession
2. No clue on what to do with players, when AND where to use them.
3. A powerplay that breaks historical records for being so bad.
4. A team that should be and playoffs and isn't even close.
5. A team that gives up 2 goals in a few minutes 20+ times.
6. A d-corp that goes from 203, down to 176, down to 146 points.
7. No or very little adaption with any of the above.
Such a coach should be fired. At the VERY least, his assistants.
|
Unless you are actually a member of the hockey club you are literally missing 90% of what's needed to perform a true evaluation on GG. You can form an opinion on the results like we all do, and it is a results oriented business, but you have very little to go on in regards to knowing the WHY those results happened.
The fact you boil up every thing you are missing to simply a "few angry speeches behind closed doors" is a testament to how truly out of touch we are in regards to what we think we know as fans.