Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Not fussed - the post completely ignored the points I was making, had no suggestions as to PP replacement players (just the usual "anyone would be better"), no comment on exactly what was inaccurate (since I can show the PP time stats, I know I'm right there), and just the "you must be related" type of comment that everyone knows is useless.
It's like posts from people who insist Brouwer was on the PP because GG insists on RH shots. Which (a) he doesn't for forwards; and (b) had nothing to do with Brouwer, who wasn't a PP shooter.
|
The point is that you have no point, but you feel the need to pipe in whenever anyone makes any negative comment about GG or Brouwer and
correct people.
We dont need to be corrected. Especially with ridiculous justifications that you continue to manufacture.
A guy with 0 PP goals all year does not belong on a PP when 9 other forwards are siting on the bench,. End. Of. Story