Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
My original long post was about finding the mix with analysis and avoid making assumptions either way.
So to say "it's not luck!" was pretty much exactly what I think needs to be avoided.
Of course luck plays a role. So does the coaching/structure/system, individual player performances, etc.
|
Right, okay, but after 160+ games one would think that luck would eventually meander towards the mean and that sample size would indicate that conclusions can be drawn and they wouldnt be 'knee-jerk.'
After 2 full seasons and 160 games can one not conclude that it isnt 'luck?'
That would have to be immensely bad luck, almost systemically bad luck.