Quote:
Originally Posted by Teroy
I would like to read the definition of a "proven coach". As far as I'm concerned if a coach isn't going to be retained by his current team then proven no longer applies. We keep recycling previous coaches under the guise of "proven". From the postings I've read here I'd still like to go with someone new. Huska, Hunter etc. I'm sure that Tim would kick some butt. This bs about being too hard on guys who make millions is ridiculous. Preform as poorly as the Flames do and you'd be out of your job long ago.
|
?
For example, Quenneville won 3 cups and is second only to Bowman in nhl wins.
Will the Hawks fire him? Should the Flames hire him? Don't know or care, but this guy is proven, my friend.