Quote:
Originally Posted by llwhiteoutll
Canada has no registry for non-restricted firearms, yet we don't have an issue with people showing responsibility for their firearms.
|
I don't give two squirts about Canada or Canadian law. This is the Ongoing
US Mass Shooting thread. If you want to piss and moan about Canada and Canadian gun laws please start an Ongoing Canadian Mass Shooting thread and discuss it there. Would seem ridiculous to do so, since Canada doesn't have an ongoing problem with mass shootings. I think that might have something to do with the fact that our neighbors up north, unlike us Americans, have their heads anywhere but up their ass when it comes to responsible gun ownership.
Quote:
|
As to the second part, my post was in response to wittynickname claiming that the NRA did not want to modernize background checks and that the information used for them is kept on paper. I'm well aware that the NICS system and the Tracing Center are different.
|
No, you clearly are not. Otherwise why try and conflate the two or introduce them together when they are completely different mechanisms with completely different purposes? If you knew the difference you were then just trying to score cheap debate points, or trying to confuse someone who doesn't understand. Since this isn't the first time I've had to correct you on the subject, I'll go with the probability that you yourself don't know either.
I really get tired of people who claim to be pro-gun but don't know #### about them or the actual laws and mechanisms used to protect one's rights to access those weapons. There are way too many like that in the NRA, and it appears there are a few of them up in the great white north as well. Get educated man, you're making responsible gun owners look ridiculous.