Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
And I still maintain you simply cannot say they traded Hamonic for whatever pick because if they didn't have Hamonic they would be almost assuredly in a different spot in the standings. It is an emotional and irrational way of looking at things. Which you are entitled to do but I don't get it.
|
Would they though? With zero emotion involved, I can't really see this team being anymore or less than 4-5 points positive/negative with or without Hamonic this season. This is of course assuming that the Flames would have plunked Stone into that spot and allowed for someone else to play his role with Kulak (Bart, Rasmus, Wotherspoon, FA).