Quote:
Originally Posted by Canehdianman
^ Yeah I don't really take comments like that (and the article that photon posted) very seriously.
|
What's not to take seriously about the article I posted? It reports something that actually exists (illegal content in the blockchain) and asks the necessary questions about what the implications of that are.
It's another example of where technology is outstripping the law and the law or the technology has to adapt somehow. Being able to revise the blockchain in circumstances where someone puts kiddie porn into it might be an option, but that of course kind of defeats the whole purpose of the underlying technology.
Just looking at interesting questions that come up while something evolves isn't a blanket condemnation of it...