Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
You could just have the identity of having better players than the other team.
That's basically what Chicago was.
They weren't super skilled outside of Kane.
They weren't super fast outside of Keith.
They weren't the hardest working team in the league.
They had great two way players in Toews and Hossa, but they had a fair share of one way guys.
They weren't super tough.
They were just good really.
|
I always saw the cup era Hawks as an uptempo puck possession team, with depth on the top 3 lines, solid defensive forwards like Hossa, good transition, quick puck movement, and always on the attack. With clutch game breakers. And an energetic 4th line. Frankly, an exciting team.
So do you think the Flames just need to be better, and that will get it done?