Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
You brought logic into the discussion.
You never bring logic to discussion here.
Maybe the way GG wants to match lines against the Stars, it makes way more sense to do things this way?
You would think there is no ability to change things up if it isn't working or that Stewart is is stapled to that line the rest of the season the way some are going apoplectic over a very very minor roster decision. Again one that can last 1 or 2 shifts if it isnt looking like it is working.
Its truly humorous.
|
Why do you feel the need to say one side has "logic" and the other doesn't? Bingo's post defended the logic of Stewart on the top line. Some people have different opinions - why does their logic not count? I've posted this elsewhere, but mocking posters or posts with different opinions is usually what starts the adversarial, toxic discussions we see a lot on this site.
Stewart on the top line has a ton of potential to be a bad move, and the best case scenario is no better than Bennett has been there so far. So we've got a move that, the way I see it, has a ton of potential to make the team worse, and very little potential to make the team better. Is it not logical to argue against that?
If we rolled out a top pairing of Bartkowski-Hamilton and bumped Giordano to the 3rd pair, would it be illogical to question that? In theory, you could argue something like "Bartkowski is a faster skater, and Dallas is a fast team", but do we
really need to try it to know it's a bad idea? There's a
huge difference between "there exists a line of reasoning that can defend that idea" and "it's a good idea."