Quote:
Originally Posted by nemanja2306
No, you're being ridiculous. (see, I can do that too)
WOW, 9 goals?! Amazing...  
Good in the room... who gives a a rat's ass? Stajan is good in the room, Brouwer is good in the room. The fact is, what they do on the ice is what matters the most. And he's been scratched 7 times in the past 9 games and 12 times since Jan 4th. Great player, for sure.
In isolation, it's a no risk signing. I understand that. What pisses me off, though, is what it symbolizes. Instead of going for speed and youth, we get another old and slow player who's best season was 5+ years ago. We need depth scoring, Chris Stewart is NOT that. Last time he hit 30+points was in 2012-2013. And he scored 36. How will this improve our depth scoring?
Just because it's a no risk, doesn't make it a good move. |
I missed the player floating around for free who has those assets.
This move means nothing more than adding some size and some experience to the bottom part of the roster for absolutely nothing but what he is owed on the rest of his deal this season.
You really are "way over the top" reacting on this man.