Quote:
Originally Posted by nemanja2306
No, you're being ridiculous. (see, I can do that too)
WOW, 9 goals?! Amazing...  
Good in the room... who gives a a rat's ass? Stajan is good in the room, Brouwer is good in the room. The fact is, what they do on the ice is what matters the most. And he's been scratched 7 times in the past 9 games and 12 times since Jan 4th. Great player, for sure.
In isolation, it's a no risk signing. I understand that. What pisses me off, though, is what it symbolizes. Instead of going for speed and youth, we get another old and slow player who's best season was 5+ years ago. We need depth scoring, Chris Stewart is NOT that. Last time he hit 30+points was in 2012-2013. And he scored 36. How will this improve our depth scoring?
Just because it's a no risk, doesn't make it a good move. |
I don't think it says that; he provides some insurance for us in a position that we're relatively thin in, and prices were too high on quality pieces up for grabs on RW.
If we were signing him as a free agent on July 1, I would agree with you.