Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Fancy stats are wrong. Because Kulaks time with anyone else is severly limited to the least amount of minutes imaginable.
|
That’s a good point. The numbers would be skewed. Kulak without Stone would be playing with one of the top 4. Stone without Kulak would be mostly with Bartkowski. So Stone without Kulak is probably better than 46.58 because Stone with Bartkowski is 41.89%. Haha that’s awful.
Either way, I don’t know that you can so easily conclude Stone is the important one in the Kulak-Stone partnership.