Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
It is interesting, but isn't the proximate cause of his damages the allegations put forth by CTV? I mean the guy clearly had no intention of resigning until he was forced into it due to the allegations put forward. It seems like a pretty easy line to draw, but I'm no lawyer.
|
I don’t know. If I was defending CTV, I’d be putting him to the strict proof of any assertion that resignation was his only reasonable option. Maybe he can prove it, maybe he can’t. If he can’t, then suddenly a lot of his damages start to look self-inflicted. And if I’m CTV, I say that I’m not liable for any of those self-inflicted damages.
This is obviously just off the top of my head but seems like an interesting issue to me.