Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi
Nope not me, although anyone who has seen a union card before would know it’d be very difficult(if not impossible) to convince someone it’s a receipt.
A lot of things in that article make no sense. The application was filed in late December, once an application is filed there is a 90 day freeze on wages so it would be illegal for their employer to cut their pay.
All the complaints about missed deadlines work two ways, if the union is an hour late filing an objection the board would treat it the exact same way.
With that being said, if the union is guilty of any wrong doing I hope they are held accountable.
My only question is this, if they are upset about their certification why aren’t they applying for a decertification?
|
I agree with you that there is an agenda to this article and that more investigation and detail is required. Like where are the Employees that wanted the Union. What was their view on how the signitures were collected.
When you sign a Union Card do you get a copy of the card you signed? Does the Union card state the dues required to pay and the process of joining? Do people that don't speak English well require a witness to sign to verify they understand what they are signing?
$1 per hour on $30 and less wages seems like a pretty big tax for representation. 3-5% of income seems like a lot for the services
I'm very interest in how this one plays out through the courts.
I really don't like the no private vote instant certification. It certainly leaves the process open to intimidation whether or not it occurred.