View Single Post
Old 02-16-2018, 11:04 AM   #517
stang
CP's Fraser Crane
 
stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov View Post
Well, the evidence (absent Mr. Stanley’s own exculpatory account) was also consistent with the Crown’s theory on both the murder charge and the manslaughter charge. Mr. Stanley was acquitted because, apparently, his exculpatory account raised a reasonable doubt in the jury’s minds. That doesn’t, of course, prove that he is innocent (in the same way that DNA evidence might actually exclude someone from possibly having committed a particular offence).
What evidence was that?
stang is offline   Reply With Quote