02-16-2018, 11:04 AM
|
#517
|
CP's Fraser Crane
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov
Well, the evidence (absent Mr. Stanley’s own exculpatory account) was also consistent with the Crown’s theory on both the murder charge and the manslaughter charge. Mr. Stanley was acquitted because, apparently, his exculpatory account raised a reasonable doubt in the jury’s minds. That doesn’t, of course, prove that he is innocent (in the same way that DNA evidence might actually exclude someone from possibly having committed a particular offence).
|
What evidence was that?
|
|
|