Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks
I've been too swamped at work to read everything, not sure which allegation they were referring to. I was speaking about the information reported here. That was the one where he "assaulted" her in the bedroom from what I understand.
http://canoe.com/news/provincial/wit...b-de7dbd506beb |
The fried saying they were never there is the first one.
The second is a friend who was told after the incident that it was just a peck i hadn't read before I had just read the girl friend comments but the phrasing of who she is is very wierd
Quote:
|
A woman who knows the second accuser told Postmedia that she admitted at the time that the “encounter with Patrick (had been) just a kiss, nothing more.”
|
.
Not a friend, former friend, co-worker just a women who knows. What level of friendship would you reveal assault. Also when did this declaration take place. It will be interesting how this persons claim will be dissected.
What's the motive to lie?
I see four options
PC wants to turf their leader
Libs want to destroy PCs
The two women just want to be part of #metoo
Their stories are true
I don't give 3 much credibility based on the blow back these women recieve when their names leak out and I don't see money /blackmail as a motive here given how it came out. Number 1 is absolutely crazy even if you don't like him as leader. It would have been done earlier during the leadership race. So you are left with the liberals weaponizing #metoo because the reporter had a lesbian relationship with the first complaintant and Kathleen Wynn is a lesbian was the craziest conspiracy. But the liberals finding a women to lie could be reasonable except that how do you convince a former PC intern who happened to go into a bedroom with him at a party. It's the perfect person to flip. I don't see that as a reasonable concept.
The liable suit will be interesting. I suspect it only focuses on the age of the first complaintant and Brown never is put under oath.