The issue is that it's not really clear to me if this should be considered a "negative activity", as you put it. I mean, is the story that he picked up a younger girl (who was nonetheless an adult with the capability to make her own decisions) at a bar, took her back to his place with her consent, and asked her for sex? If so, that seems like no one else's business. Maybe I'm just missing some detail here as a result of not caring that much about the sordid details of an Ontario politician's sex life.
I mean, if he had a whole public image based on being a puritan or something, and you could call him a hypocrite, that'd be one thing. This just seems like sniffing around in someone's underwear drawer.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|