Quote:
|
I think you you’d Be hard-pressed to argue that ant. Stanley did things “properly” (ie, by the book). The question is whether he did things reasonably in the circumstances at the moment of the shooting.
|
You characterized the Penner case as an accident. It was nothing of the sort. It was avoidable and the result of a lack of care, attention and knowledge. Yet when something as rare as a hang fire apparently happened, it's all about not taking proper care and attention or doing things by the book in your opinion. It seems like you're trying to win a case here so I'll just wrap it up. You win.