Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Article theorizing why the jury did what it did
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskat...dict-1.4532064
So my question is this, if the Crown appeals can they retrial by dropping the second degree murder option and appeal based only on Manslaughter or laughter.
Reading the above makes the verdict more logical.
It sounds like the Prosecution beyond having lousy witnesses, and cloudy evidence, over reached by giving three options. But is that enough to appeal? |
I wonder how hard an appeal would be with the PM and Justice minister weighing in publically? How can Stanley get a fair trial in appeal?